A writ petition regarding promotion from Constable to Head Constable was disposed of without merits. The court directed the third respondent to issue a reasoned order within three months.
Directed third respondent to pass a reasoned order on the claim within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1879 of 2019
Petitioner :- Deshraj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijay Gautam,Devesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
This petition has been preferred seeking promotion of the petitioner from the post of Constable to Head Constable.
The petitioner contends that no adverse entries or punishments have been imposed in the past five years prior to the period of consideration in terms of the notification of promotion. The further allegation is that although promotion is to be affected on the basis of 'Seniority subject to rejection of the unfit', juniors of the petitioner have been promoted.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that subject to all contentions on merits being left open, the third respondent shall duly consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order dealing with the said claim with due notice to the private respondents herein.
Learned Standing Counsel states that this exercise of consideration shall be concluded with expedition and preferably within a period of three months from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order.
Accordingly and without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, this petition shall stand disposed of in light of the statement noted above.
Order Date :- 7.2.2019 faraz
Deshraj
State Of U.P.
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
