Disposed

Sonakshi Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC20 Nov 2019WRIA/18206/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of the writ petition in terms of a previous judgment regarding re-evaluation applications for candidates, directing the petitioner to file a re-evaluation application by a specified date and directing the concerned authority to communicate the order.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed; petitioner allowed to file re-evaluation application by 21.11.2019; respondent authority to communicate order by 1 PM.

Sonakshi Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18206 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sonakshi Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Radha Kant Ojha (Senior Adv),Shatrughan Sonwal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav

¶2

Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.

¶3

On 19.11.2019, this Court passed the following order:-

¶4

"Leaned counsel for the petitioner states that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by order of this Court dated 22.10.2019 in Writ-A No. 6420 of 2019 (Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others), and therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the order dated 22.10.2019 passed in the case of Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi (supra).

¶5

Sri I.S. Tomar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel representing the State respondents and Sri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel for the U.P. Basic Education Board pray for a day's time to examine the matter and to make a statement as to whether the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order dated 22.10.2019 passed by this Court in Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi (supra). They may also obtain instructions. Put up tomorrow i.e. 20.11.2019 in the additional cause list."

¶6

Today, Sri I.S. Tomar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, states on instructions of the Examination Regulatory Authority, U.P. Prayagraj, dated 19.11.2019, that application for re-evaluation is being received from candidates in terms of the judgment of this Court dated 22.10.2019 in Writ-A No. 6420 of 2019 (Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. State of U.P. & 3 others) , and in terms thereof any dissatisfied candidate may move an application for reevaluation within the time prescribed under the said judgment i.e. till 21.11.2019.

¶7

In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment of this Court in Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi (supra).

¶8

If petitioner moves an application for re-evaluation by 21.11.2019 then his application shall be received by the respondent concerned and appropriate action in accordance with law shall be taken in terms of the judgment in the case of Narendra Kumar Chaturvedi (supra).

¶9

This order shall be communicated by Sri I.S. Tomar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, to the Secretary, Examination Regulatory Authority, U.P. Prayagraj, today by 1 PM.

¶10

Certified copy of the order shall be issued by the office to the petitioner today on payment of usual charges.

¶11

Order Date :- 20.11.2019/vkg

Sonakshi Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sonakshi Mishra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Deepak Enterprises Vs Ravinder Bahadur D.F.O. and Others

Jagmal Singh Vs Rajpal and Others

C/M Sukhpura Inter College, Ballia, and Another Vs State of U.P. and 7 Others

Anjali Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Pradeep Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sandeep Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others