The High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of prosecution as the petitioner remained absent in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34668 of 2005
Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Othersducation And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
The case is of the year 2005.
It has been called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call. Learned Standing Counsel is present for the State respondents.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 30.10.2019 Pkb/
Virendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Abhinava Upadhya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
