The High Court dismissed this called in revise writ petition involving the petitioner Zain Uddin and the State of U.P. as infructuous due to the absence of counsel for the petitioner, thereby implying the cause of action might no longer survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11424 of 2003
Petitioner :- Zain Uddin And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S. Ashraf Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 15.10.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Zain Uddin And Another
State Of U.P. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
