The court rejected a PIL filed regarding the non-issuance of a Utilization Certificate for a grant-in-aid, holding that the matter is a personal dispute and not a fit case for public interest litigation.
PIL dismissed as it is a personal dispute and not maintainable as Public Interest Litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5178 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ved Prakash Agrawal Respondent :- Union Of India And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vandeep Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Brijesh Ojha,Rajnish Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 17.1.2019 Akram
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a PIL entertaining a dispute over non-issuance of a Utilization Certificate for grant-in-aid is maintainable.
Whether a grievance regarding delayed issuance of a Utilization Certificate qualifies for PIL intervention.
Ved Prakash Agrawal
Union Of India
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
