The High Court dismissed the PIL seeking a mandamus to inquire into Swachchha Bharat Mission fund allocation. The court held Article 350 confers no right to seek relief via court and noted the complaints were found baseless.
The petition was dismissed as the prayer under Article 350 was misconceived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 5069 of 2018
Petitioner :- Prem Chandra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Gosain,Akhilesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
"350. Language to be used in representations for redress of grievances Every person shall be entitled to submit a representation for the redress of any grievance to any officer or authority of the Union or a State in any of the languages used in the Union or in the State, as the case may be"
Order Date :- 17.1.2019 Manoj
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a mandamus can be issued to decide a representation made under Article 350 of the Constitution of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prem Chandra Singh
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
