This appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared to press it. The court concluded the appellant had lost interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 936 of 2019
Appellant :- Rajpal Singh Respondent :- Sulochna And 3 Others Counsel for Appellant :- Rizwan Ahmad,B. Malik Counsel for Respondent :- Chetan Chatterjee
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None for the appellant even when the case was taken up on the revised call. On the earlier occasion, this case was adjourned on the request of Sri Rizwean Ahmad, counsel for the appellant.
As nobody is appearing to press this appeal, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. In view of such fact, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.12.2019 S.K.S.
Rajpal Singh
Sulochna
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
