Habeas corpus writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners without any liberty to file afresh.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 641 of 2019
Petitioner :- Nitya Singh(Minor) And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Prakash,Rashi Misra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Arvind Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Case is called out in the revised list.
Sri Ankit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri Nagendra Bahadur Singh and Sri Arvind Kumar Rai, learned counsels for respondent nos. 4 to 7 are present.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that his client has instructed to withdraw the present habeas corpus writ petition, therefore, the instant writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present habeas corpus writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn without any liberty to file afresh.
Order Date :- 5.11.2019 Vikas
Nitya Singh
State Of U.P.
Rajul Bhargava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
