Abdul Mabood and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a habeas corpus petition where the petitioner admitted the corpus was free before the court. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This is a habeas corpus petition where the petitioner admitted the corpus was free before the court. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 4029 of 2018
Petitioner :- Abdul Mabood And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Babu Verma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
When the case is taken up, the Court has been informed that corpus Abdul Mabood is present before the Court and he has not been detained illegally or otherwise.
Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has filed a short counter affidavit today, which is taken on record. Reliance has been placed on the averment made in paragraph 5 and 6 of the short counter affidavit.
The cousel for the petitioner admits that in view of the fact that the corpus is free, the writ petition has become infructous and the same may be dismissed as such.
Accoridngly, the writ petition is being dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.1.2019 Mohit Kushwaha
Abdul Mabood
State Of U.P.
Vipin Sinha
Ajit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court