This is an appellate order dismissing an appeal against a rejection of condoning limitation. The court held the application was barred by limitation as it did not qualify for condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 59 of 1999
Appellant :- Lal Singh And Another Respondent :- Professor Sahkari Grah Nirman Samiti And Ors Counsel for Appellant :- M.K. Gupta
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
( Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act)
Order Date :- 13.8.2019/Mukesh
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 59 of 1999
Appellant :- Lal Singh And Another Respondent :- Professor Sahkari Grah Nirman Samiti And Ors Counsel for Appellant :- M.K. Gupta
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order Date :- 13.8.2019/Mukesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed by the appellant was barred by limitation and deserves to be dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Singh And Another
Professor Sahkari Grah Nirman Samiti And Ors
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
