The single judge dismissed the first appeal filed by the appellant against the rejection of a condonation of delay application, holding the appeal barred by limitation as none contested the delay.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution due to bar of limitation on the rejected condonation order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33 Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 272 of 1998
Appellant :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Respondent :- Smt. Bhanwarkali And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Nripendra Mishra
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
( Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act)
Order Date :- 13.8.2019/Mukesh
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 272 of 1998
Appellant :- U.P.S.R.T.C. Respondent :- Smt. Bhanwarkali And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Nripendra Mishra
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay for filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.8.2019/Mukesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against the rejection of an application for condonation of delay is permissible and maintainable.
U.P.S.R.T.C.
Smt. Bhanwarkali And Others
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
