Saldeo and Another v. Ayodhya and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal rendered default due to the absence of appellant's counsel who failed to appear despite recall orders.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default.
Appeal rendered default due to the absence of appellant's counsel who failed to appear despite recall orders.
Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 899 of 1989
Appellant :- Saldeo And Another Respondent :- Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Appellant :- A.N.Bhargava,R.K.Tewari
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
This is an appeal of the year 1989. Since 2007, the counsel except seeking adjournment, does not assist in the court in any manner, though the matter was recalled on 18.9.2019. Today also non has remained present. I have no option, but to dismiss the appeal for default.
Order Date :- 25.9.2019 Ravi Prakash
Saldeo
Ayodhya
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court