The High Court disposed of a first appeal in which the appellant claimed an out-of-court settlement disputed by respondent counsel. The court permitted revival in case of difficulty.
Appelldisposed; application for revival permitted if difficulty arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 430 of 1985
Appellant :- Krishna Lal Chhabra Respondent :- Kailash Nath And Others Counsel for Appellant :- V.S.Saxena,Kashif Zaidi,R.K.Tewari,S.N.Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- M.S.Pipersenia,A.D. Prakash,H.P. Pandey,Ray Sahab Yadav,Ruchita Jain
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that the parties have settled their dispute out of the Court which was disputed by one of the counsel for respondent yesterday.
Accordingly the appeal is disposed off.
In case of any difficulty, the parties may file application for revival of the appeal.
Order Date :- 24.9.2019 Mukesh
Krishna Lal Chhabra
Kailash Nath
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
