U.P.S.E.Board v. M/S Sai Steel Industries
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1126…
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1126…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1126 of 1993
Appellant :- U.P.S.E.Board Respondent :- M/S Sai Steel Industries Counsel for Appellant :- S.P.Mehrotra Counsel for Respondent :- Sumit Daga
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Sri Sumit Daga for the respondent is present.
The appeal as such as per Sri Sumit Daga has already become infructuous.
After 1997, the appeal listed in the year 2019.
It is reported that U.P. Electricity Board's Advocate Sri S.P. Mehrotra has been elevated to the Bench. The paper-book was to be filed in the year 1997, which has yet not been filed.
In these circumstances, I have no other option but to dismiss the appeal of 1993 for non-prosecution as the appellants were under an obligation to appoint any Advocate once their Advocate has been elevated. The counsel appointed by it has been elevated and has already been retired also. Despite that, no counter-affidavit has been filed.
In these circumstances, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 13.9.2019
Irshad
U.P.S.E. Board
M/S Sai Steel Industries
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court