First appeal filed against an order dismissing an application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as it was barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1490 of 2009
Appellant :- Ashok Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Asutosh Upadhyaya
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
( Order on Application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act)
Order Date :- 12.9.2019 Mukesh
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1490 of 2009
Appellant :- Ashok Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Asutosh Upadhyaya
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay for filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.9.2019/Mukesh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ashok Kumar And Another
State Of U.P.And Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
