In two first appeals arising from the same accident, the court dismissed the Insurance Company’s challenge to a Tribunal’s award, accepting that minor discrepancies in vehicle registration did not justify interference given the amount deposited.
Both appeals were dismissed with no interference with the Tribunal’s order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 33
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. 1079 of 2001 Appellant :- National Insurance Co.Ltd. Alld. Respondent :- Raj Bahadur And Others Counsel for Appellant :- K.S.Amist
AND
Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 1080 of 2001 Appellant :- National Insurance Co.Ltd. Alld. Respondent :- Ramesh Chandra And Others Counsel for Appellant :- K.S.Amist
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
2
it call for any interference.
Order Date :- 17.9.2019 Irshad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to interfere with the Tribunal’s award where allegations of vehicle number manipulation in the policy cover note were established.
National Insurance Co Ltd
Raj Bahadur
Ramesh Chandra
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
