The High Court dismissed the criminal revision application at the admission stage due to the total absence of the revisionist on all listed dates, vacating any stay order.
The revision application is dismissed at the stage of admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 55
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4011 of 2010
Revisionist :- Smt. Sushila Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Krishna Shankar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt Advocate
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None present even in the revised list on behalf of revisionist. Learned A.G.A is present.
It appears from the perusal of the file that the case was listed on 31.01.2019 and 22.02.2019 and on none occasion the revisionist was present.
This revision is of the year 2010 and it is still awaiting an order of admission.
In view of the absence of the revisionist, the revision is dismissed at the stage of admission.
Stay order, if any, shall stand vacated.
Order Date :- 4.12.2019 PS
Sushila Singh
State Of U.P.
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
