In a criminal revision regarding an application to condone delay, the High Court dismissed the application due to non-prosecution despite the absence of the revisionist, in the presence of the Government Advocate.
Application for condonation of delay dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 143 of 2000
Revisionist :- Prem Chand And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashfaq Ahmad Ansari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List has been revised.
No one turned up to press this delay condonation application while learned A.G.A. is present.
The application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Registry is directed to inform the trial court to proceed with the case in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 14.2.2019 m.a.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed in default.
Prem Chand and another
State of U.P. and others
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
