Smt. Pushpa Devi and Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal revision filed against a summoning order in a matrimonial case, the court refused to dismiss the petition in default despite the absence of the revisionist, relying on a Supreme Court precedent. After perusing the record and noting that evidence was recorded under CrPC sections 200 and 202, the single judge held that the lower court rightly summoned the accused. Consequently, the
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision was dismissed; the summoning order was upheld; any stay order was vacated. The order was transmitted to the lower court for compliance.