The Court dismissed a criminal revision filed under Sections 397 and 400 Cr.P.C. against an order allowing an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., finding no manifest error or illegality warranting interference.
Revision dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 106 of 2000
Revisionist :- Mahendra Pal Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
State of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
