This criminal revision was called in the absence of appearance. The bench perused the record and found no manifest error or illegality in the lower court's order rejecting the revisionist's claim of juvenile status. The revision was dismissed.
Criminal revision dismissed; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1341 of 1997
Revisionist :- Dinesh Kumar Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Revisionist :- S.Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 14.11.2019 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow criminal revision seeking declaration of the accused as a juvenile.
Whether the impugned order rejecting the application for juvenile declaration requires interference.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Dinesh Kumar Gupta
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
