Atma Singh v. Lalji Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed criminal revision for manifest error in acquittal holding none justified interference and vacated interim order.
What did the court decide?
Criminal revision dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 948 of 1993
Revisionist :- Atma Singh Opposite Party :- Lalji Singh Counsel for Revisionist :- Scrai Counsel for Opposite Party :- AGA
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
- This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated 31.03.1993 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Ballia in Sessions Trial No. 219 of 1986 acquitting the opposite parties from the offence under Section 302/21 I.P.C.
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
- Dismissed.
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
- Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately. Order Date :- 11.7.2019 PS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Atma Singh
- respondent
Lalji Singh
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/948/1993
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court