This revision petition, filed by a senior citizen against convictions under Sections 304A and 279 IPC, was partly allowed. The court maintained the conviction but modified the sentence to reduce it to the period of imprisonment already undergone.
Sentence of imprisonment under Sections 304A and 279 IPC reduced to the period already undergone.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2024 of 1998 Revisionist :- Genda Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K.Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the sentence awarded to a senior citizen accused undergoing imprisonment should be reduced to the period already undergone.
Whether the conviction under Sections 304A and 279 IPC should be maintained while modifying the sentence.
Genda Lal
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
