Mirul Hassan and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Court No. - 50

Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 543 of 2019

Revisionist :- Mirul Hassan And 3 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Revisionist :- Janardan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Aniruddha Singh,J.

¶5

This case has been assigned by Hon'ble the Chief Justice vide order dated 7.2.2019.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the revisionists the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This revision has been filed with the prayer to quash the judgment and order dated 30.11.2018 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/FTC II Deoria in S.T. No. 30 of 2012(State vs. Sikandar Khan and others ) in Case Crime No. 513 of 2011 under sections 498-A, 304-B and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act,Police Station Rampur Karkhana, District Deoria whereby revisionists have been summoned.

¶8

Learned counsel for the revisionists submitted that impugned order is illegal, arbitrary, perverse and without evidence.

¶9

Learned AGA opposed and submitted that the impugned order is just and legal.

¶10

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that no case is made out to interfere with the impugned order.

¶11

However, it is observed that in case revisionists surrender and apply for bail within two months from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. For a period of two months from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the revisionists. It is further observed that the aforesaid case be decided expeditiously according to Section 309 Cr.P.C.

¶12

With the above observations, the revision stands disposed of finally.

¶13

Order Date :- 7.2.2019 P.P.

Mirul Hassan and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mirul Hassan and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gendi @ Gedan Vs State of U.P.

Mehraj Vs State of U.P.

Mintu Giri Vs State of U.P.

Harikishan @ Harikrishna Vs State of U.P.

Satya Kumar Mishra and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mukesh Vs State of U.P.