This court dismissed a criminal revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. without any party appearing to press the matter. The revisionist failed to demonstrate any manifest error or illegality warranting interference.
Impugned order and confirmation of conviction and sentence are upheld; interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2109 of 1999
Revisionist :- Balbir Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Revisionist :- K.K.Dwivedi,R.P.Dwivedi,Ramanuj Yadav,Sunil Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 1.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any manifest error or illegality justifies interference in the present criminal revision.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Balbir Singh
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
