Dismissed
Devendra v. Kamla
Allahabad HCCRLR/1561/1998
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A single judge dismissed a criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. against an order confirming the conviction and sentence in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case, finding no manifest error or illegality.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1561 of 1998
¶3
Revisionist :- Devendra Opposite Party :- Kamla Counsel for Revisionist :- Ikram Ahmad
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by judgement and order dated 20.08.1998 passed by Sri Hari Mangal Singh, VIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad in Criminal Revision No. 76 of 1997, dismissing revision and confirming sentence and conviction imposed by Sri Shankar Lal, IInd Additional Judicial Magistrate, Chandausi vide judgement and order dated 27.02.1997 in Case No. 581 of 1995, under Section 125 Cr.P.C. Being aggrieved, revisionist preferred present revision.
¶7
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
¶8
- Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶9
- Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately. Order Date :- 1.11.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the impugned order in Section 125 Cr.P.C. case suffers from manifest error warranting intervenion.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Devendra
- respondent
Kamla
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1561/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court