In Criminal Revision No. 2000 of 2001, the court disposed of the revision against the State of U.P. as infructuous because a government appeal with similar facts and circumstances was previously decided by this court on 11.3.2004.
Revision disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2000 of 2001
Revisionist :- Tashlim Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Brijesh Sahai,Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,A.K. Awasthi,Manish Tiwari,Samar Singh
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Alok Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri Samar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party have stated that Government Appeal No. 2975 of 2001 having similar facts and circumstances of this revision has already been decided by this Court on 11.3.2004 and therefore, this revision has become infructuous.
This revision is pending since 1.8.2001. As the appeal against the parties has been dismissed and therefore, this revision has become infructuous.
This revision is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.3.2019 A. Pt. Singh
Suresh Kumar Gupta
A. Pt. Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
