Due to non-prosecution and delay in filing the revision, the application for condonation of delay was rejected, and the criminal revision was dismissed as time barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 128 of 2001
Revisionist :- Bhagat Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Divakar Rai Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List revised. Revisionist or his counsel is not present. Learned A.G.A. is present.
As per office report, there is delay in filing the revision.
In the light of the above, Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application is, hereby rejected for non prosecution. Revision is also dismissed as being time barred.
Let it be consigned to the record.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
A copy of this order be communicated to the court below for necessary compliance.
Order Date :- 1.3.2019 Vibha Singh
Bhagat Singh
State Of U.P.
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
