recorded in revision preferred against an order passed by Magistrate under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and it has also been discussed in this case that where the High Court in exercise of its revisional powers had set aside the findings of facts recorded by the lower court under Section 125 Cr.P.C. it has been held by the Supreme Court that, "it is well settled that the Appellate or Revisional Court while setting aside the finding recorded by the Court below must notice those findings, and if the Appellate or Revisional Court comes to the conclusion that the findings recorded by the Trial Court are untenable, record its reasons for coming to the said conclusion. Where the findings are findings of fact it must discuss the evidence on record which justify the reversal of the findings recorded by the Court below. This is particularly so when findings recorded by the Trial Court are sought to be set aside by an Appellate or Revisional Court. One cannot take exception to a judgment merely on the ground of its brevity, but if the judgment appears to be cryptic and conclusions are reached without even referring to the evidence on record or noticing the findings of the Trial Court, the party aggrieved is entitled to ask for setting aside of such a judgment.
