In a criminal revision challenging a maintenance award, the court dismissed the petition for non-appearance and lack of merit, finding no illegality.
Revision dismissed; cause of action may no longer survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1188 of 1996
Revisionist :- Smt. Sarla And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- S.R.Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,N.L.Agarwal
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Manoj
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the maintenance order passed by the Family Court.
Whether the Revisionists have lost interest or the cause of action no longer survives.
Whether any illegality or irregularity was committed by the Family Court in passing the order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Sarla And Others
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
