In this criminal revision, the delay condonation application was dismissed for want of prosecution. Consequently, the revision itself was dismissed.
Delay condonation application dismissed for want of prosecution; criminal revision dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1164 of 1996
Revisionist :- Smt. Vijai Laxmi Alias Bachanu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Ali Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Called out in the revised list. None responds for the revisionist. Learned AGA for the State is present.
This criminal revision has been filed as time barred with application of delay condonation, which is still pending, to be decided.
The Delay Condonation Application for delay in filing the revision is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.
Revision is also dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 27.2.2019 Manoj
Smt. Vijai Laxmi Alias Bachanu
State Of U.P.
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
