Smt. Gulnaz @ Neha and 4 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition filed for quashing an FIR under Sections 366, 504, and 506 IPC. Instead of granting unconditional relief, the Court directed the petitioners to produce the victim to record her statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. before the expiry of a stipulated period, after which coercive action could be initiated if directed. The Court
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of; Petitioners directed to produce victim to record statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C.; no coercive action until such production or after expiry of specified date.