Petitioner failed to appear. State counsel stated the writ petition became infructuous by efflux of time. Petition was dismissed. Interim order vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 26898 of 2018
Petitioner :- Veervala And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Sri Gaurav Pratap Singh, learned AGA for the State is present.
Learned A.G.A states that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
However, it will be open for the parties to move appropriate application within six weeks' from today, if the matter still survives.
Order Date :- 27.11.2019 Nadeem Ahmad
(Ajit Kumar,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Veervala
State Of U.P.
Ajit Kumar
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
