This revision petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the revisionist did not appear. An interim order was vacated.
Revision dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 55 of 2012
Revisionist :- Vijay Kumar Mishra Opposite Party :- Durgash Kumar Shukla Counsel for Revisionist :- Ashutosh Shukla,Sheo Ram Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Swapnil Kumar
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the revisionist to press this revision. Sri Swapnil Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent is present.
The civil revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 19.4.2019 Pratima
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Vijay Kumar Mishra
Durgash Kumar Shukla
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
