The court disposed of a contempt application after noting that the impugned order had been complied with based on an affidavit filed on 09.04.2014, resulting in the discharge of any notices.
Contempt application disposed; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1076 of 2014
Applicant :- Ram Dhani And 3 Others Opposite Party :- Mr.Ravi Prakash Srivastava Posted Consolidation Officer Counsel for Applicant :- Suneeta Kushwaha Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Manoj Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the applicants in revised call. Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Standing Counsel appears for opposite party.
From the affidavit of compliance filed on 09.04.2014, it is evident that the order in question has been complied with.
Consequently, nothing further survives in the contempt application and the same stands disposed of. Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 SP/
Ram Dhani And 3 Others
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
