The court dismissed the contempt application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear after listing revision and no notice was issued to the opposite party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1137 of 2014
Applicant :- Tavarak Husain Opposite Party :- Surya Prakash Mishra D.M. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Applicant :- H.M. Srivastava,Neeraj Srivastava
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
List has been revised. No one appears for the applicant in revised call.
Surprisingly at the admission stage present contempt application has not been pressed upon and at no point of time any notice has ever been issued to the opposite party.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Notices, if any, stand discharged.
Order Date :- 1.5.2019 SP/
Tavarak Husain
Surya Prakash Mishra
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
