Imtiyaz Ahmed v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the second bail application for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant and the Learned AGA was absent.
This order dismisses the second bail application for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant and the Learned AGA was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8787 of 2016
Applicant :- Imtiyaz Ahmed Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Radheshyam Yadav,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 12.3.2019 Manoj
Imtiyaz Ahmed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court