Sartaj Husain v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed due to want of prosecution as no representative was present for the applicant or the State on the date of hearing.
The bail application was dismissed due to want of prosecution as no representative was present for the applicant or the State on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41079 of 2014
Applicant :- Sartaj Husain Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Gupta-Ii Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,P.K.Srivastava,R.B.Sahai
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Order Date :- 12.3.2019 Manoj
Sartaj Husain
Rajendra Kumar-IV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court