Court granted bail to applicant in narcotics casing. Bail granted due to non-compliance of N.D.P.S. Act mandatory provisions and reformative theory, subject to conditions regarding appearance and misuse of liberty.
Released on bail on personal bond with two sureties (Rs. One Lac each) subject to conditions regarding court appearance and procedural compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6504 of 2019
Applicant :- Rajkumar @ Raju Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ali Hasan,Deepak Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Sanjay Singh, learned A.G.A.-I appearing for the State.
It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that 500 gram contraband article, i.e., Charas is said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He further submits that there is no compliance of mandatory provisions of Sections 43, 50, 52 and 57 of the N.D.P.S. Act, hence the recovery is bad in the eyes of law. The applicant has no criminal history with respect to the N.D.P.S. Act. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 02.12.2018. The applicant has no other reported criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment , the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case let the applicant Rajkumar @ Raju involved in Case Crime No. 973 of 2018, under Section 8/20 N.D.P.S. Act, Police Station Brahmpuri District Meerut be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties (Rs. One Lac each) (One should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, with the following conditions:-
i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.
Order Date :- 15.2.2019 Arti
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving 500 grams of contraband Charas.
Whether the lack of compliance with mandatory provisions of the N.D.P.S. Act entitles the applicant to bail.
Whether bail can be granted despite the severest punishment under the N.D.P.S. Act due to reformative theory.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Rajkumar @ Raju
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
