Allowed

Ram Lakhan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Feb 2019BAIL/5123/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In criminal bail application No. 5123 of 2019, the court allowed bail for Ram Lakhan charged under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 IPC. Considering the compromise deed, payment of disputed amount, and no criminal history, bail was granted with a personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Applicant to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount.

Ram Lakhan Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 44

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5123 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Lakhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Sri Harishankar, learned Advocate has filed his power on behalf of the complainant, the same is taken on record.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant has filed supplementary affidavit, the same is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned counsel for the complainant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶8

Argument on behalf of the applicant has been extended to the effect that in this case, applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant has no role to play in the commission of the offence. He adds that the entire controversy has been solved between the parties and the disputed amount has been paid over to the informant. The certified copy of the compromise deed has been annexed as Annexure no.SA-1 to the supplementary affidavit. Offence is triable by Magistrate First Class. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant has no criminal history and is languishing in jail since 2.12.2018 in the present case.

¶9

Learned counsel for the informant has not disputed the compromise deed. The learned A.G.A. also could not dispute the aforesaid facts.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions and the nature

¶11

of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant- Ram Lakhan involved in case crime no.1304 of 2018, under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 IPC, Police Station New Agra, district Agra be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶13

Order Date :- 7.2.2019

¶14

Raj

Ram Lakhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Lakhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nazim Vs State of U.P.

Aashish Jawala Vs State of U.P.

Soni Vs State of U.P.

Ramadhar Vs State of U.P.

Ravindra Kushwaha Vs State of U.P.

Satish Singh Vs State of U.P.