Nazim Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 44

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3653 of 2019

Applicant :- Nazim Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

Argument on behalf of the applicant has been extended to the effect that in this case, applicant is not named in the FIR. He further submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant was not caught on the spot. The applicant has no role to play in the commission of the offence. The police has planted false recovery against the applicant. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. Factum of recovery is denied. In case, the applicant is admitted to bail, there is no possibility of absconding or misusing the liberty of bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 05.09.2018 in the present case.

¶7

The learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Considering the rival submissions and the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, this bail application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant- Nazim involved in case crime no.199 of 2018, under Sections 380, 411 IPC,

¶10

Police Station G.R.P., district Barielly be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

¶11

Order Date :- 6.2.2019

¶12

Raj

Nazim v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nazim v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Dilshad Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Das Vs State of U.P.

Aashish Jawala Vs State of U.P.

Soni Vs State of U.P.

Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.