Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application dismissed. The court, after hearing rival contentions regarding witness testimony and the gravity of charges, found no good ground to release the applicant and rejected the bail plea.
Bail application rejected with a direction to the Trial Court to decide the case expeditiously within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 23
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50381 of 2017
Applicant :- Sanjeev Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sikandar B. Kochar,Amit Daga,Rakesh Prasad,Tushar Kant,Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vikas Tiwari
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
"Among other considerations, which a court has to take into account in deciding whether bail should be granted in a non-
bailable offence, is the nature of the offence; and if the offence is of a kind in which bail should not be granted considering its seriousness, the court should refuse bail even though it has very wide powers under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure."
Order Date :- 25.3.2019
Akram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the accused-applicant satisfies the conditions for release on bail in a non-bailable offence involving serious charges including murder and attempted murder.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State Vs. Captain Jagjit SinghReferred¶10
State Vs. Captain Jagjit Singh, 1962 AIR 253 · Who else cites this
Sanjeev
Rajendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Rajendra Kumar
Parties & counsel
