Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail applicant was absent to argue the application after multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution.
The bail applicant was absent to argue the application after multiple adjournments, leading to dismissal for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4732 of 2019
Applicant :- Dharmendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- None Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Case called out in revised list.
None is present for the applicant to press this bail application.
Perusal of record shows that on previous date also, no one was present to press this bail application.
The bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.12.2019 A. Tripathi
Dharmendra Singh
Raj Beer Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court