Sumit v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court rejected bail application in a case involving charges of kidnapping, robbery, and sexual offences under IPC and POCSO against a minor victim, holding it unfit for bail release.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; case to be decided as early as possible.
What the court decided
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 2501 of 2019
Applicant :- Sumit Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Satsangi,Sarvesh Chandra Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Sharma
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 734 of 2018, under Section 363, 366, 376, 323, 342 of IPC and 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Kasganj, District Kasganj with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that victim girl was a consenting party and that she has cooked up the case regarding kidnapping and alleged rape. FIR of the incident has been lodged on next date of incident and that recovery of victim girl has been made from an open place. Learned counsel argued that as per prosecution version, victim girl was taken away on a motorcycle and thereafter, by bus and she remained with applicant for about 13 days, which clearly shows that she was consenting party. It was further submitted that as per medical examination report, age of victim girl is 16 years and that applicant is languishing in jail since 26.08.2018 having no criminal history and that in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving kidnapping, robbery, and sexual offences against a minor girl?
Whether the facts of the case warrant the rejection of the bail application?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sumit
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Raj Beer Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/2501/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court