Allowed

Prempal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Nov 2019BAIL/46868/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed bail in a criminal miscellaneous application wherein the applicant, father-in-law of the deceased, was charged under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC. The court accepted that the case was a fit one for bail and granted release subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on personal bond and two sureties with conditions regarding tampering with evidence and attendance.

Prempal Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 68

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46868 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Prempal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Jagdish Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is father-in-law of the deceased. The applicant is an old man aged about 62 years. The applicant has no concern with the alleged incident and has falsely been implicated in the present case. At the time of alleged incident the applicant was living separate from the deceased and her husband. In post mortem report the cause of death of the deceased has been shown asphyxia due to ante mortem hanging. The deceased has committed suicide herself. The case of the applicant is distinguishable from the case of husband of the deceased. There is no criminal history of the applicant and is in jail since 7.5.2019.

¶8

Per contra, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶9

Having given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case for bail.

¶10

Let the applicant Prempal involved in Case Crime No. 77 of 2019 under Section 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P.Act, Police Station Jarcha District Gautambudh Nagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;

¶11

The applicant will not tamper with the evidences.

¶12

The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and he will cooperate with the trial.

¶13

The applicant will appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned.

¶14

In case of breach of any conditions mentioned above, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the applicant.

¶15

Order Date :- 19.11.2019 Gss

Prempal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prempal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Maiyadeen Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Umar @ Doodhiya Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Mithla Vs State of U.P.

Pavitra Narayan Alias Rinku and Another Vs State of U.P.

Umashankar Nishad and 2 Others Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Dhan Devi Vs State of U.P.