Ramu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application regarding offences under IPC 376, 366, and 506, the court held Ramu to be a fit case for bail despite the severity of charges, allowing his release on a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions.
What did the court decide?
Applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of like amount subject to six conditions.
What the court decided
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44975 of 2018
Applicant :- Ramu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Binod Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 122 of 2018 under Sections 376, 366 and 506 IPC, P.S. Mirhachi, District Etah.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case and he was not named in the F.I.R. Learned counsel has submitted that the present victim of the incident is major and her date of birth as per high school certificate is 25.05.1998. He has submitted that the girl was in consensual relationship with the present accused. He has further submitted that as per the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC the accused had carried away her straightaway to Delhi where she lived with the accused till 21.04.2018 in a rented room. Lastly, he submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 25.04.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.
Learned AGA has opposed the bail application and fairly conceded that the date of birth of the girl as per her high school certificate is 25.05.1998.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by Ramu in connection with offences under Sections 376, 366 and 506 IPC should be allowed.
Whether the applicant is a fit case for bail considering the nature of allegations and gravity of offences.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ramu
Coram
Ajit Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/44975/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court