Allowed

Ramesh Kumar Patel v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC16 Oct 2019BAIL/40922/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application filed by Ramesh Kumar Patel challenging his arrest in a case involving offences under IPC Sections 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471. The court held it to be a fit case for bail and granted the same on personal bond and sureties with standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with specified conditions.

Ramesh Kumar Patel Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40922 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Patel Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Ramesh Kumar Patel in connection with Case Crime No.98 of 2019, under Sections 411, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., P.S. Meerganj, District Jaunpur.

¶7

As per the first information report the accused persons were arrested by the police and certain recoveries were allegedly shown from them and a Scorpio vehicle was also recovered from them. Rs.500/- were allegedly shown to be recovered from the applicant.

¶8

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that the alleged recovery shown from the applicant is totally fake and false. He submitted that there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He further submitted that no identification parade was conducted by the police to ascertain the real culprits. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.07.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant Ramesh Kumar Patel involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶13

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶14

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶15

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶16

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶17

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

¶18

facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶19

Order Date :- 16.10.2019

¶20

R./

Ramesh Kumar Patel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar Patel v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandu Vs State of U.P.

Santosh Vs State of U.P.

Mohammad Shakeel Vs State of U.P.

Pullu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Aale Navi Vs State of U.P.

Majendra @ Sunil Kumar Vs State of U.P.