Allowed

Sujeet Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Sept 2019BAIL/39105/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application, the court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, considering the nature of the accusation, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the dispute involving the victim who is the sister-in-law.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail is enlarged subject to conditions including cooperation in investigation, availability for interrogation, and no inducement to witnesses or departure from India.

Sujeet Kumar Verma Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 51

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39105 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Sujeet Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Usha Srivastava,Saurabh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that victim is the sister in law of the applicant and some dispute arose with regard to some monetary transaction. The matter needs deeper and fairer investigation before any arrest should be given effect to. Therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that he has no criminal antecedents, the applicant is entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

¶9

In the event of arrest of the applicant, Sujeet Kumar Verma involved in Case Crime No. 545 of 2019 under Section 354, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Shahjahanpur, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶10

(i) the applicant will join and participate in each and every aspect of "Investigation".

¶11

(ii) the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶12

iii) the applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted

¶13

with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iv) the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶14

In default or misuse of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶15

Order Date :- 24.9.2019 Ujjawal

Sujeet Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujeet Kumar Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs State of U.P. and Another

Satish Vs State of U.P.

Shabbir Sheikh Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Rathore Vs State of U.P.

Babu Lal Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Satish Chandra Nishad Vs State of U.P.