Satish v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that bail application is rejected as no case for indulgence is made out considering the gravity of the offence despite pending trial and direction to conclude trial within six months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19445 of 2019
Applicant :- Satish Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
Applicant has moved the second bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No. 53 of 2001, under Section 302 and 201 IPC, P.S. Shamshabad, District Farrukhabad. The first bail of the applicant was rejected vide order dated 12.07.2018.
Contention of the applicant is that applicant is in jail since 05.07.2014 and till date trial has not been concluded even though while rejecting the first bail application direction was issued to conclude the trial as early as possible.
I have perused the first bail rejection order which shows that the same was rejected on the ground that applicant was absconding for the last six years.
Learned AGA has expressed an apprehension while opposing the bail application that in case applicant is released on bail he will again abscond.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who was held to be an absconder in earlier proceedings.
Whether the case can be concluded within six months from the date of this order.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Satish
Coram
Vipin Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/19445/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court