Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated being husband of deceased; that as per averments made in F.I.R. marriage between deceased and applicant did take place about 10 years back and one day before her death on 24.9.2018, deceased called her father reporting that her husband and in-laws are committing marpeet with her, but later on her mobile went switched off and on 25.9.2018 it came to knowledge of first informant that his daughter was murdered and her body was put to funeral without informing him; that entire prosecution story is absolutely false and incorrect; that deceased was blessed with as many as three children; that mere fact that after a quarrel between applicant and his wife over meals, deceased consumed some poisonous substance and when her condition deteriorated, applicant immediately rushed with her to Heritage Hospital, Agra and when she did not improve considerably he got her discharged for better treatment at Delhi, but her life could not be saved; that there is nothing on record to show that applicant ever caused any abetment to deceased for committing suicide; that no offence under section 306 IPC is made out against applicant; that applicant has not made any evidence disappear and at the most, he may be held guilty of offence under section 201 IPC for putting body of his wife to funeral without postmortem; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that he will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 28.9.2018.
